Compare Contrast Weber Fayol Taylor - 2364 Words

Running Head: Historic Perspective of Organizational Theory Historic Perspective of Organizational Theory Michelle Mendez Historic Organizational Theory Theories pertaining to concepts of management were developed by Max Weber, Henri Fayol, and Elton Mayo. Management is the central component to an organized view on what each theory encompasses, the contributions and how the theories differ and even complementary factors. Individual contributions to management theories impact organizational power as well as the society and state which the ideas are focused. The legacy of theses theories will continue to shape business in the present and future. Organizational theory is designed to understand the nature of the organization. By†¦show more content†¦Both theories were developed under the same influencing factors such as war, social struggles and industrial revolution (Urwick. 1951, p7), however each developed different management theories and instructions and vantage points. Scientific management and he developed scientific principles of management, focusing on the individual, rather than the team and aimed to improve e fficiency through production-line time studies, breaking each job down into its components and designing the quickest and best methods of performing each component. Fayol provided insight on the human reaction and identified needs of the individually and that work can be tailored based on intelligence, background and abilities. Taylor focused on the total organization rather than the individual worker, outlining the management functions of planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling. The theories proposed by Fayol and Mayo differ greatly in all areas. Fayol concentrated on management functions and attempted to generate a boarder perspective and on principles that would serve as guidelines for the rationalization of organizational activities and looked at an organization as a whole (Scott, 1992). Mayo focused on motivation techniques and individual satisfaction. Fayol directed attention on areas such as the production process and adjusted humans to this process, v ersus Mayos human relationsShow MoreRelatedCompare and Contrast of the Classical School of Management and the Human Relations School of Management1545 Words   |  7 PagesCompare and contrast of the classical school of management and the human relations school of management The classical or traditional approach to management was generally concerned with the structure and the activities of formal organization. The utmost importance in the achievement of an effective organization were seen to be the issues such as the establishment of a hierarchy of authority, the division of work, and the span of control. The classical management focuses on the efficiency andRead MoreCompare and Contrast of the Classical School of Management and the Human Relations School of Management1531 Words   |  7 PagesCompare and contrast of the classical school of management and the human relations school of management The classical or traditional approach to management was generally concerned with the structure and the activities of formal organization. The utmost importance in the achievement of an effective organization were seen to be the issues such as the establishment of a hierarchy of authority, the division of work, and the span of control. The classical management focuses on the efficiency and includesRead MoreCompare and Contrast Fayol, Taylor, and Weber’s Theories of Organizational Theory2774 Words   |  12 PagesThis assignment will compare and contrast the theoretical perspectives of management theorists Henri Fayol, Frederick Winslow Taylor, and Max Weber. Each of the three theorists had a unique view on public administration and policy. This assignment will briefly show the back ground and basic concept of each theory. Then the assignment will delve into each of the theories to determine how each theory stacks up against one another when they are laid side by side. The development of Taylors theoryRead MoreTheories of Organizational Behavior10512 Words   |  43 Pageshundred years later, German sociologist Max Weber wrote about rational organizations and initiated discussion of charismatic leadership. Soon after, F W Taylor introduced the systematic use of goal setting and rewards to motivate employees. In the 1920s, Australian-born Harvard professor Elton Mayo and his colleagues conducted productivity studies at Western Electric s Hawthorne plant in the United States. Though it traces its roots back to Max Weber and earlier, organizational studies is generallyRead MoreOrganizational Theory - an Introduction4170 Words   |  17 PagesInternational edition 1990. The model is developed by C. Borge-Andersen 1998/2004 Characteristic 1 – the Effect: Theories related to formal relationships that can influence organizational behaviour: Efficiency theory developed by Fredrick W. Taylor 1911 and his Scientific Management (SM). Clue: Fords T-model. The theory was developed to achieve organizational job efficiency through analysis of job assignments in order to determine optimal performance (†stop watch†-analyse). †¢ MotivationRead MoreOrganisational Behaviour4208 Words   |  17 Pagesorganisation†. Management is at the centre of the leaf and participates in all 4 major organisational systems co-ordinating the work of each of these systems as well as determining organisational objectives. The four structures I have decided to compare and contrast are; ââ€" ª Simple line ââ€" ª Functional ââ€" ª Matrix ââ€" ª Clover Leaf A simple line structure is connected by solid, vertical lines connecting staff to display direct line relationships. Senior staff in this structure are referred toRead MoreFredrick W. Taylor Ideas in Todays Organisation2487 Words   |  10 PagesFredrick W. Taylor (1856 Ââ€" 1915), pioneered the scientific management movement which studies a job carefully, breaking it into its smallest components, establish exact time and motion requirements for each task to be done, and then train workers to best complete these tasks in the same ways over and over again (Schermerhorn, Hunt Osborn, 1998). These efforts are the forerunners of modern industrial engineering approaches to job design that focus on process efficiencies, the best methods and smoothRead MoreEssay about Classical vs Human Relations Approaches to Management1813 Words   |  8 PagesMANAGEMENT ESSAY INTRODUCTION This essay compares and contrasts the â€Å"Classical† and â€Å"Human Relations† approaches to management. It focuses on how these approaches are similar and compatible and looks at their differences and incompatibilities. It then explores how systems theory and contingency theory can reconcile the incompatibilities between the approaches. The essay is structured as follows. First, the essay shall explain the nature of the â€Å"Classical† and â€Å"Human Relations† approaches toRead MoreHistory of Management Thought Revision17812 Words   |  72 PagesPart Two The Scientific Management Era The purpose of Part Two is to begin with the work of Frederick W. Taylor and trace developments in management thought in Great Britain, Europe, Japan, and the U.S.A. up to about 1929. Taylor is the focal point, but we will see his followers as well as developments in personnel management and the behavioral sciences. Henri Fayol and Max Weber will be discussed, although their main influence came later, and we will conclude with an overview of the influenceRead MoreCompare and Contrast Semco to a ‘Classical Organisation’, I.E. One Which Has a Traditional Approach to Industrial Relations.2284 Words   |  10 Pagesof the classical organization theory. There were three forms of management that formed this theory; a. Scientific management b. Administrative management c. Bureaucratic management We shall compare and contrast Semco with each of these theories that make up the classical theory. 2.1 Similarities Fredrick Taylor (1911) also known as the father of scientific man agement developed his theory after witnessing firsthand, the ineptitude of some workers and the low level of production occasioned by poor performance